Having a requirement of having the discussion open for at least 2 weeks seems long. We could also use the extendedconfirmed criteria (500 edits) as a threshold for the number of global edits. I'd also add that the registered editor must have at least 6 months old. MarcoAurelio ( talk) 12:42, 22 August 2017 GZWDer and MarcoAurelio: A "registered editor with at least global edits" looks fine in your sight? R adiX ∞ 13:01, 22 August 2017 (UTC) I'm tired of open concepts which are only sources of drama and conflicts due to its interpretation. Registered user with some firm criteria to be determined is what I'd only support. What an "established contributor" is? It is a subjective, non-objective and undetermined concept. GZWDer ( talk) 08:59, 22 August 2017 GZWDer: I'm sorry but at least "can always return home or use their moblie phone" is unlikely to be happened for the Refugees (either from Middle East or from North Africa) to me. RadiX: Yes, but what does "an established user" defined? Global ban is nowhere a emergency request. Could please point out how it differs from any other nomination made by an anonymous editor? Should the purpose be avoiding sockpuppetry/trolling, it'd better rewording this phrase entirely (maybe by replacing the text above with "an established user" instead?) R adiX ∞ 03:15, 22 August 2017 59.63.248.140: They can always return home or use their moblie phone. have a Wikimedia account and have at least one edit in any Wikimedia projects before the nomination GZWDer: Hello. because they're visiting Meta-Wiki in the Pentagon, which is used to limit login access of non-"US government"-related sites to protect their information. NoFWDaddress ( d) 21:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC) Oppose limiting IP requests, there's some reasons that a good-faith user can't really login, e.g. If my previous statement was not explicit enough, yes, I oppose to this cooldown period which is unnecessary unless proven otherwise by real cases. If you oppose the limit you may explicitly comment here and the limit might not be added.- GZWDer ( talk) 20:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
![mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017 mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017](https://demo.dokumen.tips/img/380x512/reader023/reader/2020111420/5ad7d9fb7f8b9af9068cbdc2/r-2.jpg)
However this may be another measure to prevent abusing the process.
![mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017 mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017](http://pinsac.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/7/126734692/456856813_orig.jpg)
Yes, I admit a cooldown limit is only my idea. GZWDer: let's not add unneeded rules and stop making every WMF project a bureaucratic monster. MarcoAurelio never mentioned a cooldown limit and there is no reason to add this 6 months forced break. Minimum 2 weeks, maximum one month looks appropriate to me. Please also consider adding a minimum and maximum duration of any global ban request. Requests can be closed after an extensive discussion when no consensus is likely to be reached. Requests can be closed without extensive discussion when frivolous. Stewards may extend the discussion in exceptional circumstances. Discussion should be open for at least two weeks, but no more than one month. Once a valid request for comment has developed a broad and clear consensus, an uninvolved and impartial steward may close the discussion. Also, allowing IP users making global ban requests opens a window of trolling. The fourth request made by IP user are likely unsuccessful too. As there were recent (within one year) global ban requests made by IP users with no inform process, and were closed as unsuccessful. Add a prerequisite for global ban proposers.Note the scope of global ban is still limited by criteria 1. In Requests for comment/Global ban request for Messina, neither German Wikipedia nor Commons has "demonstrated broad support", but there're clearly good reason for global ban and it's continued based on the principle ignore all rules.
![mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017 mp4 converter ultra video keygen 2017 - full version 2017](https://i0.wp.com/www.bicfic.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/tipard-video-converter-serial-key-pic-2.jpg)
sock puppetery) and some wikis have no community-based block or ban process at all (e.g. This is because some wikis have arbcom, which overrules community discussion some blocks are imposed by individual admins but it's rather uncontroversial (e.g. In criteria 3 for global bans, remove the need of support from community discussion.I hereby propose two changes to the global ban policy: A consensus supporting the proposed changes exists among the respondents. The following request for comments is closed.